Page 1 of 1
Dest address calculating bug?
Posted: Thu Mar 03, 2016 1:39 pm
by Dr. MefistO
a2 = 0x00FF0000
d1 = 0x4000F801
a3 => 0x00FEF800
How is it possible?
If it is possible, then this comparing will be true? (a4 =
0x00FFF800)
Re: Dest address calculating bug?
Posted: Thu Mar 03, 2016 2:08 pm
by Stef
For address calculation you used d1.w so only word part (lower 16 bits) of D1 register, in which case it consider signed 16 bits indexing.
So internally D1 is *signed* extended to 32 bits before being added to A2, that explains the result.