New Documentation: An authoritative reference on the YM2612
Moderator: BigEvilCorporation
I'm interested in this too. I've got some old IC design books from the 1970's and 1980's which seem to be a good resource. I think at the end of the day, you need to learn as much about how to design these circuits as possible. If you understand what the principles of the design are, you should be able to more easily recognize what individial elements on the circuit are.Also, does anybody have any links to good resources for learning how to read IC schematics? Looking at all the photos of the YM2612 has made me want to be able to analyze these circuits for myself.
-
- Very interested
- Posts: 273
- Joined: Fri Feb 29, 2008 8:12 pm
- Location: United States
I didn't see it mentioned on any of the last few pages, but this topic might be of interest: http://forums.sonicretro.org/index.php?showtopic=28589
Hi there! I've been monitoring this thread for awhile now and updating the Wikipedia article on the YM2612 as this has progressed. Seeing the OPN2 finally decapped is really amazing, and it's interesting comparing the full die image to those of the decapped OPL2 and OPL3. Seeing a decapped VDP would be amazing as well, even one from a Model 2 Genesis/MD. Anyway, I'm curious if it's possible to get a good clean image of the decapped OPN2 for use on the Wikipedia article, like this? That way I can include it on the YM2612 article.
(It'd be even more awesome if, at some point in the future, a YM2608 and YM2203 get decapped, just to see the progression of development of the OPN family in general. I wish I had the hardware/money to donate. T-T Wishful thinking, hahaha.)
Anyway, thanks for all of the amazing decapping and photographing work, and I can't wait for more info to surface on my favorite FM synth chip family.
(It'd be even more awesome if, at some point in the future, a YM2608 and YM2203 get decapped, just to see the progression of development of the OPN family in general. I wish I had the hardware/money to donate. T-T Wishful thinking, hahaha.)
Anyway, thanks for all of the amazing decapping and photographing work, and I can't wait for more info to surface on my favorite FM synth chip family.
As long as it's not illegal or anything, how about creating a Kickstarter for decapping as many Mega Drive chips as possible, from every motherboard revision?
If many people show interest and the initial goal is met, more systems could be added, even (Mega CD, Mega 32X, SEGA Nomad, Laseractive SEGA pac, SEGA Pico, or anything related).
Oh, and hi.
If many people show interest and the initial goal is met, more systems could be added, even (Mega CD, Mega 32X, SEGA Nomad, Laseractive SEGA pac, SEGA Pico, or anything related).
Oh, and hi.
There's no legality issue, in fact, reverse engineering itself isn't illegal, and we aren't even doing that, just "modifying" a physical device we legally own.
I two would love to see the Saturn chips decapped. I don't know if I've ever mentioned this publically before, but once my Mega Drive emulator is finally complete and released, with MegaCD and 32x support, I'll be turning my sights on the Saturn in a major way.
All that said, my ability to contribute financially to this effort at this point is virtually nill. Mortgage + kids, plus all the financial stress in the world today, well, I'm sure a lot of other people are in the same situation. It would be good to know just how much a decap like this costed all up, for the decap plus the photos, that way we would know the kind of money that needs to be raised. I mean, $50 for a chip is probably doable. $150 kind of puts it a lot further out of reach...
I two would love to see the Saturn chips decapped. I don't know if I've ever mentioned this publically before, but once my Mega Drive emulator is finally complete and released, with MegaCD and 32x support, I'll be turning my sights on the Saturn in a major way.
All that said, my ability to contribute financially to this effort at this point is virtually nill. Mortgage + kids, plus all the financial stress in the world today, well, I'm sure a lot of other people are in the same situation. It would be good to know just how much a decap like this costed all up, for the decap plus the photos, that way we would know the kind of money that needs to be raised. I mean, $50 for a chip is probably doable. $150 kind of puts it a lot further out of reach...
Hi guys,
I think I made a nice hardware implementation which could be used to experiment a little (undocumented registers, etc...). I just posted this : viewtopic.php?t=1122
Please tell me what you think
Thanks a lot !
sig
I think I made a nice hardware implementation which could be used to experiment a little (undocumented registers, etc...). I just posted this : viewtopic.php?t=1122
Please tell me what you think
Thanks a lot !
sig
Don't know if I mentioned this (only to AamirM, I think), but if anyone is doing anything Saturn related work, I'd be glad to help in any way I can - I've a full library of games to test in emulators (all full quality bin/cue dumps), and an almost full library of hardware revisions to test applications on (the evolution of the hardware is mighty interesting & actually breaks some games).Nemesis wrote:I two would love to see the Saturn chips decapped. I don't know if I've ever mentioned this publically before, but once my Mega Drive emulator is finally complete and released, with MegaCD and 32x support, I'll be turning my sights on the Saturn in a major way.
I want to write down all documentations, but I still need to properly photo the machines I have with the lightbox I built - oh, and I want to write a CMS behind this too (not gonna cave in and use wordpress, oh no).
edit: perhaps soon it will be time to open a Saturn board here.
And here's the partial SH1 die shot:
http://decap.mameworld.info/2010/06/29/the-big-picture/
It's the Hitachi HDS6437097F CDB106 from the saturn... there are actually multiple revisions of this too... an earlier one: HD6437097F20 CDB105, and a later one, 315-5932 YGR022, which is basically that chip and the otherwise separate YGR019 disc controller under one ASIC.
-
- Very interested
- Posts: 2984
- Joined: Fri Aug 17, 2007 9:33 pm
Decapping the SH1 or SH2 is a waste of time and money. Both chips are fully documented by Hitachi/Renesas, and it's not like the Saturn use "undocumented" features of the chips like older systems did on older CPUs (like the undocumented opcodes on the 6502). Put that money into decapping the chips that matter, like the VDP1 and VDP2!
The Saturn uses a custom "SH1 + other things" though, and it's supposed to hold the details over the copy protection, which remains poorly understood even today (there is talk about not one but 3 security rings, two being red herrings).
And the entire CD Block is a black box that you cannot interface with, only with BIOS calls, last time I checked. The copy protection details may be in the YGR chip though. Thing is, no one knows anything about either of them, AND there is no way to access or work with any of them.
Compared to that, the VDP1/2 is almost fully documented.
If we'd skip the cd block, I'd put my money on the SCU. The DSP part has poor to missing documentation. Even if it only used by a few dozen games, it is the biggest unknown. Plus the SCU itself is responsible for a lot of timing related things.
Anyway, this is going off topic.
And the entire CD Block is a black box that you cannot interface with, only with BIOS calls, last time I checked. The copy protection details may be in the YGR chip though. Thing is, no one knows anything about either of them, AND there is no way to access or work with any of them.
Compared to that, the VDP1/2 is almost fully documented.
If we'd skip the cd block, I'd put my money on the SCU. The DSP part has poor to missing documentation. Even if it only used by a few dozen games, it is the biggest unknown. Plus the SCU itself is responsible for a lot of timing related things.
Anyway, this is going off topic.
On the topic of sound chips, the SCSP would be very interesting since it does both FM and PCM (I guess an operator would just read from a PCM buffer instead of the quarter-sine ROM). I think the Sonic Jam games used it directly instead of emulating a YM2612, although I could be totally wrong.Huge wrote:If we'd skip the cd block, I'd put my money on the SCU. The DSP part has poor to missing documentation.