IDE for asm
Moderator: BigEvilCorporation
IDE for asm
Hello,
I wondered if there exists a quite evoluted IDE for 68000 asm, supporting features as :
* local labels
* telling which registers are modified in a subroutine
* allows easy navigating between different subroutines in a large code
For the moment I use Edit68k (from Easy68k asm) and it had nothing of that...
I wondered if there exists a quite evoluted IDE for 68000 asm, supporting features as :
* local labels
* telling which registers are modified in a subroutine
* allows easy navigating between different subroutines in a large code
For the moment I use Edit68k (from Easy68k asm) and it had nothing of that...
Well I just use vim. Out of the box when loading a file you can type
Then you can use simple keyboard commands like gd to go to the definition of the subroutine. It should work with local labels too. As for seeing what registers are modified in a subroutine you could make a plugin to do such.
and syntax will be highlighted.:set ft=asm68k
Then you can use simple keyboard commands like gd to go to the definition of the subroutine. It should work with local labels too. As for seeing what registers are modified in a subroutine you could make a plugin to do such.
Thanks for the answer. I've never used VIM, and from what I know about it, it would take me nearly as tmuch time to get familiar with it than to code an entire Genesis game Unless you have a good tutorial for asm coding ?sega16 wrote:Well I just use vim. Out of the box when loading a file you can typeand syntax will be highlighted.:set ft=asm68k
Then you can use simple keyboard commands like gd to go to the definition of the subroutine. It should work with local labels too. As for seeing what registers are modified in a subroutine you could make a plugin to do such.
Noone uses anything else ?
-
- Very interested
- Posts: 2984
- Joined: Fri Aug 17, 2007 9:33 pm
These days, I use Geany for my IDE of choice. It has syntax high-lighting and understanding for various languages, including assembly (in general, no processor in particular). It's very easy to use, but doesn't have all the things you want.
If you want something geared specifically for 68000 assembly, you'll need to go old-school, not new. Try DEVPAC for the Amiga - I used that all the time back when I used the Amiga. It was my 680x0 dev tool of choice. You'll probably run it in an emulator, but on a modern PC, it will still be pretty fast. I'm sure there's probably an ST package or two for those people who used to use the ST.
If you want something geared specifically for 68000 assembly, you'll need to go old-school, not new. Try DEVPAC for the Amiga - I used that all the time back when I used the Amiga. It was my 680x0 dev tool of choice. You'll probably run it in an emulator, but on a modern PC, it will still be pretty fast. I'm sure there's probably an ST package or two for those people who used to use the ST.
-
- Very interested
- Posts: 237
- Joined: Fri Apr 17, 2009 7:35 pm
- Location: USA
Seconding Geany, it's good. vim is probably better if you are willing to learn how to work it but I'm not.
my album - last thursday died last week
-
- Very interested
- Posts: 484
- Joined: Sat Mar 05, 2011 11:11 pm
- Location: Berlin, Germany